Pages

Monday 8 January 2024

What's rules and what isn't?

Opening with an aside - yes, I was aware when I originally started drafting this article, a year or more ago, of the One D&D announcement, and the likelihoods of lots of comments all over the D&D-social-media-verse. I may add my two-pennorth on the UA material per se in a while, but for now, here's the video in case you missed it. 

Explanation of radio silence hereabouts to follow in another post. I just found this in the pending pile and thought I'd finish it.

Ok, that done, and branching off from some of the back-then just-announced UA material, here's a thought for you.

Are races and backgrounds part of the core D&D rules?

I've actually discussed this briefly before, but having read the UA stuff, I'm even more convinced that the answer is 'no'. You could possibly even argue that the spell lists aren't, and I'd probably not disagree much, Races and backgrounds are very much part of the setting, not the rules: I would, for instance, not be in the least surprised when Shadow of the Dragon Queen comes out that the list of available PC races is not 'everything in every rulebook so far', any more than it is in my world. Now, to be fair, Krynn is reachable by spelljammer (or one assumes, other planar travel means), so there is (and doubtless people will make) a case that any PC race can have turned up somehow. (So maybe I'm going to be proved wrong :D)

But...

If every PC race from every rulebook is available 'because the rules say so', then you take away one of the things that makes a setting special. OK, perhaps we can tone that down a bit, and say 'not every PC race is native to the world'. Maybe that sits better. 

"But", people will say, "PCs should be special". Yup. Yup they should. PCs are the heroes of the story, and they should wind up being special, being heroic (if it's that kind of campaign), and I will never deny that. And yes, if you can come up with a background for your PC being from a non-native race to the world, more power to you.

But.

Constraints are good. I've had some of the most fun ever playing in a campaign setting that is restricted, where I can't be just anyone: in some cases I've chosen to impose those restrictions myself (e.g. playing an ordinary mortal in a Vampire: The Masquerade setting), in some cases they come with the setting (Krynn as of the original DL modules being a great example. I think this boils down to the whole 'if everyone is special, then no-one is', which is largely why I'm not a V:TM fan (purely because it made vampires NOT be special (or required you to redefine 'special'). 

The caveat, of course, is this only holds as long as the players are aware of the constraints inherent in the setting from the start (remember what Session Zero is for!). I.e. they are aware that there are constraints WHEN they sign up for the campaign. 

End thought, at least for now.


Saturday 14 August 2021

Languages in your campaign

A topic that's come up a couple of times in the past few days is what languages your players speak. This post was originally prompted by a thought-provoking tweet from The Umbral Knight (with which I thoroughly agreed!):


So, here's a look at Altrion. I'm not going to use the whole world as an example, but here's what the six characters in my party speak and why. I'm also going to leave out non-'mundane' languages like celestial etc.

First note - there is no 'Common' as such. In fact, I'd love it if D&D Beyond would let me remove 'Common' from my players' lists :D

The party met in Ambar, which is a Venice-like port on the east coast of the Meral Sea, the inland sea just west of the desert of Tabal.

  • Jennan is half-elven and his family have been local to Ambar for several generations. As such, he was raised speaking Imperial Sasarkan and Elvish. The former is the official language of the Sasarkan Empire, which covers the north and east coasts of the sea. As Ambar is right on the border with Magar (also part of the Empire) he has a smattering of Magarran. He's also picked up the Meral trade talk, a pidgin used by sailors and merchants all around the sea, which is some basic Imperial Sasarkan peppered with loan words from Iannosian and further afield - in fact most of the party can make themselves understood in this, so I'm not going to mention it more. Because he's a priest of Verdana of the Nine, he's also had formal training in Old High Sasarkan, which is essentially the Latin to Imperial Sasarkan's Italian, and in which temple documents across the entire faith are written.
  • Kiera is also half-elven, but her parents fled with many other half-elves from Meara (home of most of the half-elves) to Tabal (part of the Sasarkan Empire) during the Gerethian invasion a century ago. As such she speaks Elvish and Mearan by virtue of her heritage, Tabalin from where she was raised, and passable Imperial Sasarkan (though it's not her first language). In addition, as the first chapter's BBEG was from Taran, she has been making an effort to learn Tarani. She may have a smattering of Andorean, as it was probably her parents' second language. 
  • Samira is from Tabal, but human. As you can probably guess, she has Tabalin as a first language, and more than enough somewhat accented Imperial Sasarkan to get by.
  • Callie is a priestess of Kerila of the Nine, originally from Causeway, a city port on the far East coast, who is on secondment at the temple in Ambar. As a Causeway native, she speaks Andorean, which is the closest thing to a common language east of the central spine of mountains (the Grey Mountains), with a recognisable East coast accent. As a temple foundling, she has been formally taught both Imperial and Old High Sasarkan, and as one of her best friends for her teenage years was from the south-eastern kingdom of Madria, she also has conversational Madrian
  • Aidan is a mercenary, originally from Greygate, high up in the mountains on the Andor/Sasarka border. His most recent work has been with a Mearan unit called the Hawks, hence he speaks Andorean and Imperial Sasarkan with almost equal facility, as do many residents of Greygate, and enough Mearan to banter with his comrades.
  • Linus is from the north-eastern tip of Altrion, the chilly peninsula of Estariol. Andorean has even reached there as the predominant tongue, so it's his first, though somewhat accented, language. As a wizard, he's learned Imperial Sasarkan for research purposes, and he has a smattering of Estarolian, which is otherwise largely restricted to the more ‘native’ Estarolians who travel little or have no contact with the outside. It’s not uncommon for such folks to not, or pretend not to, speak Andorean.  

Andorean is probably the least pure of the languages on Altrion - it's definitely the one for which 'mugging other languages in a dark alley for vocabulary' holds most true, and it's been doing it for a long time, to the extent that most speakers have no idea where words originated. 

It is also probably the one with the most identifiable regional dialects, ranging from the relatively pure version spoken in Mirador to the dialect spoken in Zagarash, which is liberally sprinkled with loan-words from Draconic and Orcish. And, just to amuse my inner linguist, it's probably the only language on Altrion with no inclusive/exclusive 'we' distinction. 

A side note - half-elves in Altrion are, as I may have said before, a distinct race, not a human/elf cross - it's actually a mistranslation of the Elvish for 'second people', as they are, essentially, Corellan's second creation. For a long while, the majority lived in Meara, speaking a dialect of Elvish leavened with Mearan loan-words, but, since the diaspora, it's more and more common to find half-elves for whom Elvish is at best their second rather than first language.


So, we have a party who can actually communicate, as they do all speak Imperial Sasarkan to a greater or lesser extent, although some of the conversation may get laced with bits of the trade pidgin if someone is struggling for vocabulary. And several subsets of the characters can have private conversations if they so choose :D

How do things work in your campaign?

   


Tuesday 3 August 2021

Gifts Money Can't Buy


 ...or, how to make your party unfathomably rich and voluntarily trade it away. A little tale from session 43 (wow) of my current campaign. 

This does, to a degree, require a party with a vaguely heroic, non munchkin mindset, but...

Our heroes are down in the bowels of Stonesplitter Deep, a lost citadel of a forgotten dwarven clan, when they (finally) find the tomb of the master smith/artificer, Kharin Stonesplitter, and some treasures, namely some mithril plate, Kharin's workbooks, and two 20lb mithril ingots. In Altrion, mithril is rare and pretty much jealously guarded by the dwarves, and you need a dwarven master smith and a lava/elemental-powered forge to stand any chance of working it.

Party very swiftly realise they can't break the ingots down, and a single ingot is more than just about anyone can afford, just on pure rarity value. They also have acquired (by doing a very very old white dragon a favour) a large pile of shed white dragon scales, and they happen to know someone who knows someone....

Specifically, the mage who's agreed to ferry them back from Stonesplitter Deep happens to know that the Crown Prince Gralin of the dwarves is in the city of Alcar (on their way home) overseeing the rebuilding of the city gates after a dragon attacked them, and doing a good job of drinking the temple out of ale. A meeting is arranged, and a deal struck. All the mithril, and the dragon scales, and the workbook, and the knowledge of where Stonesplitter Deep is, in return for a dwarf-forged suit of dragon scale armour for the ranger (which will incorporate some of the mithril as chainmail parts), and A Favour To Be Named Later (in the best NFL trade tradition). 

Both parties are happy, to say the least.

Thursday 27 May 2021

Paying your DM

It would appear to me that the easiest way to generate a massive load of diverse, and in some cases, flat out rude and judgemental, comments on D&D/RPG fora at the moment is to offer your services as a DM for money. 

And to be honest, this is starting to make me grumpy.

First off? Yes, I get that there are people who are not willing to pay someone to DM. That's fine. If you feel that way, then clearly you aren't the target market for the service being sold. That doesn't instantly make them bad, or evil money-grubbing so-and-sos, just because you aren't willing to pay them what they think their DMing services are worth.

I contend, though, that you projecting your value assessment onto theirs is just plain rude. Sure, there are lot of folks out there who DM for the love of it, who are willing to shell out for the paraphernalia [oo, good word] of the art of the DM just for the love of it, and because entertaining their players is reward enough. I happen to fall into that category, with the additional caveat that I personally don't rate myself highly enough to want to charge, and I don't enjoy DMing complete strangers. And yes, that's entirely possibly good old imposter syndrome and social anxiety talking.

But...

I have paid someone to DM, and enjoyed it and felt it was money well spent (cheaper than a night down the pub at current prices, for sure!). I learned quite a bit from it, too.

If you're good enough, and you can find willing players, then the sole judges of whether your DMing services are worth the money are the people paying for the game, not some self-appointed gatekeeping purist on the internet who thinks D&D should be free. (Because, let's face it, unless you as a DM are pirating your rulebooks, writing all your own scenarios, using a free VTT and video client if you're online, and making all your own figures and scenery if you're not? it sure as hell isn't.) And if you're overcharging for what you're delivering, you'll be the first to find out.

I very much doubt anyone's yet made legal minimum wage as a for hire DM, either. 

Thursday 14 January 2021

Joining the dots part 2

Some interesting comments and some further thoughts on yesterday's post - if nothing else I surprised some of you by actually posting for the first time since July!

Roger (via email) observes, wisely, (paraphrasing) that even if you're exploiting the players' quest for the interconnectedness of things, you still need to work to preserve the illusion that they are discovering connections that already exist, rather than having the world quietly morph beneath their feet to match their conclusions. Once you've broken the implicit trust that the players have that they're playing in a consistent world, it's hard to re-establish. As I commented yesterday, being able to bluff and keep secrets is a useful skill. 

To expand on that thought further, though: to be able to pull this off well when you have to, you need to earn your players' trust that you're not 'out to get them', to play fair with the dynamics of the story and make sure they understand and enjoy the fact that you are there to facilitate the telling of a story in which their characters are the heroes, with challenges thrown in their way.

Conversely, though, what you'd rather not do is throw your whole story line away because the players join the wrong set of dots - see the cartoon[1] Alan suggested for a rather excessive example. Sure, if the players want to go deal with this imagined threat, fine: but you can treat as a short distraction, or work out a way of weaving it into your wider arc... Or of course, they can just be wrong. I think part of your reaction has to depend on the tone of your campaign and the attitude of the players - if you're telling heroic fantasy and its a genuine misinterpretation by the players that has potential, it might be worth running with. If the players are, on the other hand, just doing it to deliberately derail the game, then maybe you need a wee chat.,., you should probably already have had one, in fact.

Which leads to the next point. Apophenia is a positive asset for a story-telling DM. It's the trait that allows you to look at half a dozen PC backgrounds, and pull out of it both a reason for them all to meet and perhaps give most or all of them hooks into the campaign you're planning. (Remember what we said about how good fantasy novels tie up loose ends). 

I tend to take the paragraph or so I get from each player (or my notes on the session I spent helping them generate a character), and weave a bit of backstory in that ties them into the spider's web of threads that is the campaign. Of course, at that point my spider's web can be a bit loose, with strands labelled things like 'this NPC and this one are connected because of something to do with X', or 'organisation Y is after information about Z for some reason", and my implicit contract with the players is that I promise to tighten it up with facts before it matters. Performing the background exercise with the players also prompts me to create new connections, as well as tightening up some of the loose links that are already there.

My session prep does, to a large part, consist of rechecking the connections I've already got notes on in the light of what happened last week, what's planned for this week, and what bright ideas hit me at 3am. I think my major need is to be able to understand why what's happening this coming week is happening. In addition, there's another unspoken contract I have with myself and the players that I won't retcon things that have in anyway 'appeared on stage' or influenced events on stage (unless it's because someone was wrong in a way that I can rationalise with existing facts, in-character), nor will I break connections even if the players don't know about them yet (especially if that connection is the prompt for an NPC's actions). I and my players have a story to tell, and for me and I hope for them, that story has to be consistent at the time and in retrospect. I am giving serious thought to using mind maps for this - stuff is already in LegendKeeper, which allows me to link things.

I'd be fascinated to know, for example, how far ahead someone like Matt Mercer plans. I'm very much planning the section headings a long way out, the nearest section probably has chapter titles, and the current and next chapter probably have outlines. I also think in, and am inspired by, images a lot, so in some ways the section headings may be more mental graphical storyboards, or scenes way in the future that I think I want to happen. Part of the truck, though, is not to get so wedded to those that you railroad players towards them, and there's an art to dribbling clues so that the party can choose their path based on them.

To wrap up - Phil (one of my players in the email campaign I mentioned a couple of posts ago, as is Alan) has useful apophenia in spades - he has a knack for looking at bits of plot and history and going 'oh, wait, so does that mean'... I love it when my players do this! But, anyway, he provided a quote that suns up, I think, why we play D&D, from the late Jack Cohen in one of the "Science of Discworld" books:

"[...] plenty of creatures are intelligent but only one tells stories. That's us: Pan narrans. And what about Homo sapiens? Yes, we think that would be a very good idea."


[1] Apologies but this has a really obnoxious privacy cookie dialogue.

Wednesday 13 January 2021

Apophenia, joining the dots, and the art of the Dungeon Master

...or 'why Marisha Ray enjoys putting clues together'.  

 ap·​o·​phe·​nia | \ ËŒa-pÉ™-ˈfÄ“-nÄ“-É™  \

: the tendency to perceive a connection or meaningful pattern between unrelated or random things (such as objects or ideas)

This is a word that's come up quite a bit frequently, in a number of interesting articles by some of my ex-colleagues, analysing the phenomenon of conspiracy theories and comparing them to ARGs. I'm not linking them, but there's enough keywords in the post for you to... um... find a connection :D

"What's an ARG?", I hear you ask.

Back in the day (around 2005) I used to work for a small company called Mind Candy Design, which some of you with kids of the right age may know as the creators of Moshi Monsters, but before that an ARG - Alternate Reality Game - called Perplex City, involving collectible puzzle cards and a range of websites tied to a story that... for want of a better world... manifested in the real world. It was the successor to games like The Beast (a promotional tie in to the "AI: Artificial Intelligence" movie), which again, posited a future reality overlapping the real world for the players to look for carefully placed clues in. 

One of the problems with an ARG is apophenia: in short, the players' tendency to see a connection where there isn't one, and go off on a wild goose chase. This can be a little bit more of a problem in an ARG, because the last thing you want is your players deciding that, for example, the letter counts of the words in the cryptic text message sent to all registered players represent a phone number via some transformation hinted at on a website (which you as GM never intended), or something more complicated. So they post their conclusions on whatever player forum they're sharing with other players. and good old confirmation bias and mass apophenia take hold, because people want the rush of solving something. And some poor sod who is absolutely nothing to do with the game winds up getting a whole load of cryptic phone calls....

I'm not going to go deep into the parallels with modern conspiracy theories, other than to note that the key difference is that in an ARG there IS a solution to the puzzle. And you can come down from On High and head your players off if they're causing a public nuisance based on incorrectly piecing together the facts - sure, it breaks immersion, but the alternatives are worse! Conspiracy theories, by contrast, just give you the dopamine rush of making the connections, and in the really scary variants, someone is feeding the 'players' with the clues to what they want them to believe. 

So, coming the other way? Do your players ever jump to the wrong conclusion and proceed to worry on it like a dog with a really juicy bone? That's apophenia. If you're at all the kind of DM who gives them clues and puzzles, that's what they're getting off you anyway, by design - the dopamine rush of having the bits fall into place (just watch Marisha Ray in Critical Role campaign 2 episode 111 - she even says she's unpicking a whole bunch of background clues 'conspiracy theory style'!)

But the connections are all fictitious, because it's just a game, except that you, the DM, know which ones are right. So... interesting question, then? If the players pull together some clues that aren't connected in your notes, and come up with some brilliant conclusion, what do you do? Can you actually exploit this human trait?

I think my answer is 'it depends'. It is (and I have done this), if you can bluff really well, possible to run a mystery scenario by throwing half a dozen clues out into the ether, and let apophenia do its work. Your players will find connections, and if you listen and keep a poker face, you can give them the rush of solving a mystery that never existed. As I said, I have done this - my players (we were sharing a house) demanded I run something when our scheduled Sunday afternoon event got cancelled. There were times when I was literally 10 minutes behind them in figuring out what was actually going on in the crime-solving scenario I set going - and they openly admitted afterwards they never knew. (I literally figured out 'Diamond' referred to a racehorse 90 mins after it cropped up in the scenario!)

Conversely, of course, you may have a brilliant set of interconnected plot threads, and your players have just managed to fixate on the fact that the BBEG and another NPC have the same colour cloaks and weapons, and draw a chain of conclusions that have precisely zip to do with the plot you had in mind. Again, what you do here is kind of your call. You can run with it, you can tweak your plot such that there's another clue to get them back on the rails at the end of this rabbit hole, or you can disappoint them when they find out they're wrong...

Part of the joy of D&D (as well as the 'winning' reward for beating up the bad guys) is that rush you get for figuring out what the BBEG is up to - 'winning' is at least partly predicated on hooking the clues together. In short, D&D and other RPGs reward your players' desire to join the dots. As a DM, sometime before that, it also rewards your desire to join the dots when creating the scenario or campaign!

Moreover... you are (at least, if you're running and plotting that kind of setting) telling a story. One of the tenets of the good fantasy quest story is that of not leaving loose ends. Part of the reward of reading, again, is that you get to share in the rush of seeing all the little threads tie up (except for the hook for book 2 in the epilogue, of course :D). D&D, at least for me, and I hope for my players, is like that: the story needs to wrap up (eventually) neatly, sometimes in one go, or in other cases with a thread that leads them on to book 2, the next session, the next chapter, call it what you will. 

For me then? I welcome apophenia. It helps me tell stories. 


Saturday 11 July 2020

Let me tell you a story...

Sitting comfortably?

Got a drink?

Good. Ok. So. Back in the day... which as you should know if you've been reading this blog a lot is an oblique way of saying 'before most of you were born'... there was no Critical Rôle, no Acquisitions Inc, no Taking 20.... we didn't have Zoom, we didn't have Roll20, Fantasy Grounds, FoundryVTT or even TTS. No video. No personal web pages. Hardly any web pages at all, in fact. At the time we're talking about, we didn't even have images: the Internet was 80-character fixed-width text on a terminal.

And you're all going 'hush, old-timer, this is turning into the Four Yorkshiremen sketch...'. right about now. Well, hush yourselves, and listen. Sure, we didn't have CR, and endless YouTube feeds and blogs. We had Usenet - kind of imagine it like Facebook Groups or Tumblr but plain text and better organised, ok? And on Usenet there was, originally, a group called rec.games.frp, where 'rec' meant it was in the recreational hierarchy, and the rest should be obvious. Due to volume of traffic, that split around 1991-2, and (A)D&D postings wound up in rec.games.frp.dnd, and there were other groups for various other games and genres, plus rec.games.frp.archives, which was a moderated group where various postings of a less ephemeral nature went.

As you can probably imagine, finding opponents outside of your own face-to-face circle proved something of a challenge. I was lucky in that I managed to jtoin a play-by-email game advertised on rec.games.frp run by a fellow Englishman called Phill Everson, the Mariner campaign, set in the Forgotten Realms. There I played a gleefully unrepentant and charismatic thief called Philippa of Mistledale (fans of 80s BBC TV may remember a character from 'Bergerac' called Philippa Vale, on whom she was heavily based) and ran into a couple of characters with whom she formed something of a bond within the party, Fost Darkwing (played by Mark Little) and Jade Skye (played by Rob Holden).

When Mariner faded out, I decided to run a campaign set in my own world of Altrion, and invited Mark and Rob along into what became the Midnight's Bane campaign, again run over email with the two of them, my friend Janet from the Twin Cities (who I'd actually 'met' on a different Usenet group) and a  local friend here in the UK. Back them, email wasn't this instant thing: Alan and later Rhodri were local to me, so we all had the advantage of Cambridge's decent connectivity; Mark was on the UK academic network, so he was OK. Janet was working for a small US company who dialled out for email every four hours or so, and Rob - Rob was at Plymouth State College in New Hampshire. PSC dialled in to the University of New Hampshire for email once or maybe twice a day at first. I'd stay late at work for a couple of days after I'd mailed out a turn, so that their noon Eastern Time dialup had time to filter through to me (via several more hops and about an hour or two) and I could catch an email and reply to him, and maybe if PSC did a midnight mail run it would be waiting for him in his morning.

That ran for a good few years, and... well...

The closest thing the community had to YouTube live play sessions? Writing the games we played up on rec.games.frp.archives. There were a number of popular write-ups on there - you can usually find them with the subject tag "STORY:" - such as Thomas Miller's massive "Adventurers" series. Tim's (no surname I know of) "Assassins", many chronicles by Jason Zavoda, and my own "Midnight's Bane". Posting for the latter was slow, because I wrote for players in the present tense, and rewrote each episode in the past tense for posting to the group. But - these were the Critical Rôle, Save or Dice, you name it, of the day, in terms of getting accounts of D&D play in front of what was probably an over 50% university student audience. I like to believe that the likes of Thomas, Jason, us, and the other contributors to the group may have inspired some people to play, to try their hand at writing.

"The party are camped by the X"
It certainly taught me how to write, starting from my fiest steps in the Mariner campaign, how to pace, how to describe things for people when you had no maps bar those you could draw in ASCII characters, and no dice. It also made me new friends: Mark and Rob were both excellent role-players, and contributed by their deeds, character ideas and questions about the world into making the setting of Altrion what it became. D&D at its best is collaborative storytelling and creating legends with friends, and we did this for several years.

The Midnight's Bane campaign, and the other face to face games, fizzled out in the mid-90s when I got married and then moved away from the group I DMed regularly: also I'd managed (in my usual 'plan the high spots and wing the rest' approach) to plot myself into a corner with the PBEM group and I couldn't figure out a way to continue that I was personally happy with, so I kept putting it off.

Enter, a couple of decades later, this blog, after I fell down a YouTube rabbit hole that ended up with Critical Rôle, and rediscovered the fun of D&D. I got in touch with the old party, all of whom were keen to resume. Some emails were missing, but after a mammoth archive and reconstruction effort we managed to pick up a turn or two before things originally stalled...

Rob Holden - 1961-2020
"Drax Stormwind"
Rob, sad to say, was battling stage 4 pancreatic cancer. He passed away this last Wednesday.

One of my bigger regrets is that we never got to meet. We spoke on the phone during a weekend where we ran a huge battle involving both the face to face and email parties, and we exchanged emails off and on in the intervening years. He was always cheerful, imaginative and willing to roll with the plot (even when he discovered his character Drax's mother, Sirina, was working for the major villains!). You probably never knew him, but if you followed the D&D groups on Usenet in those days at the start of the '90s when there was a thriving community there, if you read the Midnight's Bane stories, you read his words, you knew his character 'voice'. In a small way, he was part of the 'actual play' trend of that time.

In this connected world, our friends aren't always people we've met in person. Even more so now, perhaps, when it's easy to make contact across the 'Net (and right now, harder to do so in person).

Tell your friends, wherever they are, what they mean to you. You never know when you'll get another chance.

Still got that drink?

Good.

A toast, then.

To friends near and far away, and to the memory of a fine friend, rôle-player and father: Rob Holden.

Thursday 16 April 2020

Virtual roleplaying part 8: combat aids

Deep breath, because today we're going to install a module that does make some pretty majorly useful (despite the name) changes to FVTT from a gameplay point of view.

It's Minor QoL Improvements (MQoLI), and it kind of does what it says on the tin (a reference that may be lost on my US readers - sorry!).

Ok - hit ESC and back out (in the GM client) to Setup, Add-on Modules, Install Modules. The manifest URL is here, and the docs are here - neither of those links is likely to change. Let's install it (this is the last time I'm going to remind you how!), relaunch the world, enable the module from Manage Modules, and have a look at its configuration (Configure Settings, Module Settings).

There is an absolute boatload of stuff here, some of which covers stuff we haven't got into yet (but will very shortly).

The author (tposney on Discord) is very responsive to bugs as well - I found a very minor issue in what I'm about to demonstrate to you (only on Macs) the other night, and it was fixed before I started editing this post again the following morning.

For now, though, let's just accept the defaults, and start another combat encounter with poor beleaguered Alaric and a couple of goblins.

Player view
Fire up Alaric in his own browser window, pop out the Combat Tracker, click to roll his initiative.

(Note that if you need to fiddle initiative (not that I'm ever suggesting GM's do that, of course), you can right click on a line in the Combat Tracker, select Modify and change their roll.)

Lucky old Goblin 2 gets to go first, so let's work through this like we did before. As the GM, select Goblin 2, right click on Alaric to bring up the Combat HUD, select the target icon, then double-click on the goblin to bring up his character sheet, go to the Features tab.

Mouse over the icon for the short bow, and click on it now it's turned into a d20...

Now, as before, check the chat window.

Neat, huh? OK. That's it for Goblin 2, so click on the right arrow at the bottom in the Combat Tracker to advance to Alaric.

In the Player client, we can move Alaric to attack Goblin 1 (in my map, that's up arrow then right arrow, or numeric pad 9 to move up and right), then click on the target icon (2nd row of the left hand icon bar) and select the Goblin. As before, the targeting arrows appear.

By now you should have Alaric's longsword on the quick bar down the bottom. Note that if you did so before we installed the Minor QoL Improvements module, you will need to drag it off the quick bar and re-add it by dragging from his inventory, because the underlying code for the action has changed now we added the module.

So, that done, click it or hit the appropriate key in the number row, and let's beat up on the goblin.

Notice how, with MQoLI loaded, Foundry does the whole thing for you, working out if you've hit and what damage you do. (There seems to be a slight glitch where it doesn't say what you've hit, which I'm clear on why (see, I don't know everything).

This screen grab is from an
earlier session.
Even cooler, if your roll is a critical, Foundry automagically applies critical damage, and if you click on the dice math line (e.g. 2d8 + 3) it will open up to tell you what it did to get to that result.

Cooler yet (just how cool can we get?), if you hold down Alt (Option on the Mac) as you click on the attack, it automatically rolls with Advantage. If you hold down Control (Command on the Mac), it will roll with Disadvantage.

Right. One more thing for this time out. Let's add another character quickly (so quickly, I'm going to skip stuff I'd do if I was taking it seriously). Meet Fenella, one of Alaric's adventuring companions. For the purposes of this exercise, she has the spell Burning Hands (typical of her!), so let's restart the combat, and see what Foundry lets us do when she casts it.

As before, let's assign Owner rights on the character to our player (Actor, Configure Permissions) - note that a player can control, more than one character.

I've dragged the spell icon from her book onto the quick bar, so let's click it...

Now. What happens here takes a bit of getting used to, and you will find yourself popping into the GM window to delete spell area templates for a while till you stop getting your mouse clicks in a knot. (To do this, select the Measurement Controls icon on the left, then the trash can, then follow the prompt to get rid of all templates, or you can click on one and hit the delete key.)

When you click on the spell button, an area effect template outline in black will attach itself to your cursor. Do NOT at this point click. You can move it by moving the mouse, and rotate it with the mouse wheel. When you're happy with the location, THEN click, and you will see the targeted squares highlit in colour.

If you have the right option set in MQoLI, it should auto-target and damage the
affected critters. If it doesn't, you can target them manually with the Targeting tool, click on the spell name in her spell book and then the Damage button, and she will automatically roll damage in the chat window, the target will try and make a save AND one spell slot will get crossed off her sheet.

Again, the best I can suggest here is have a play: you'll make lots of mistakes while you're getting used to things, but if you have enough screen real estate to work with a GM and a player window onto Foundry, you should be able to get your head round how combat work and how MQoLI improves it, as well as what players can do versus what you as the GM can.

Right.

Next time we're upgrading to 0.5.3, since it seems to be pretty stable now, and having a look at what's changed. 0.5.4 is out, with even more shininess, but that's very much bleeding edge and I wouldn't in general use even numbered versions for a 'production' game.

Stay safe, and roll good dice! (or have Foundry roll them for you!)

Upcoming posts (subject to change as I go):
  • part 9: upgrading to 0.5.3
  • part 10: player communication
  • part 11: D&D Beyond







Friday 3 April 2020

Virtual roleplaying: administrivia

Ok. Some adminiatrivia.

Firstly, our noble leader, Atropos on Discord, has announced Foundry Virtual Tabletop has an official release date of Friday, May 22 and will be available to purchase starting Friday, April 19 from the official website. More details in the video on the right.

Next up, just to clarify - this series of tutorials are currently running Foundry 0.5.1. There are new features in 0.5.3 (released this last Monday) that I will mention in passing, but I'm giving the new version a week or so to stabilise, and modules get updated, before I update the test server. As per usual, I'll break the live server first, swear a lot, and then do it right for you folks on the tutorial server. There will also be a 'updating to 0.5.3' post.

Away from gaming, I am currently about to hit Holy Week at church: normally this is a fairly non-busy time, but we are running virtual church services, and I'm responsible for video editing. We have services every day from Sunday coming up until Good Friday and then again on Easter Sunday, and I'm also in the middle of setting up a limited company etc for my new job that starts at the end of April, With those in mind, I can't guarantee these posts will be as regular as before, for which I apologise.

Stay safe, and there should be another tutorial out later today.

Sunday 29 March 2020

Virtual roleplaying part 7: connecting a player, My First Encounter

Time to break out of your lonely existence and let the players connect! Actually, for now, you get to test it yourself, but the principle will be the same.

Make sure you have a scene active in your GM connection in FoundryVTT, then go to the Settings right hand menu, select Invitation settings and (for now) copy the Local Network link. We'll cover players from outside your network in a couple of posts time.

Start up another browser: if you're running on Windows or Mac, the FoundryVTT app hosts the game and (probably) your GM connection [if you're running on a dedicated server, you'll already be connected in one browser, and you need to connect to the game again in a separate browser]. Either way, paste that link into your browser and connect. You should see a familiar dialog, so select the Player name and enter the access key you set for it, then hit Join Game Session. Two screens will help here if you have them!


The first thing you'll see is your Player Configuration dialog - all you really can do here is change the colour of your player icon, and if the GM has given you permission, upload your player portrait.

Once you click Save Configuration, you'll find yourself in the dark :D

Go to the GM session, drag that player's character actor onto the map, and give them a torch like we did last time (don't forget to hit Update Token). In the player window you'll see them appear and the scene light up.

Drag the goblins onto the map in the GM window, if they aren't already there.

It's not that easy to watch when you're controlling both, but you will see a little dot with the player's colour that indicates where their cursor currently is - this is useful if one of you wants to point something out to the other. If it gets annoying, the GM can turn it off (somewhere, I'm sure. I saw that config option and now I can't find it!!!).

Anyway, here's Alaric, as before, in the temple entrance with a torch, but this time under player control.

You can use the cursor keys or the numeric keypad to move him, and Control+scroll wheel to rotate him, as before. So, like we did before, let's stroll up to that ominous looking door...

... and open it by left clicking on the little icon.

Cue dramatic music! (Yeah, yeah. It is supported. We'll get to it later!)
Player's view.
GM's view with no icon selected.
It's combat time!

Go to the Gamemaster window, make sure you've selected the topmost icon on the left (Basic Controls), and Select Tokens next to it, and drag a box round all the active tokens. Bring up the Combat Tracker in the right hand menu (second icon from the left) and right click on any of them, to bring up the Combat HUD (of which more shortly) and click the bottom right icon to add all the tokens to a new Encounter. (By the way, if you Control-click on the Combat Tracker icon, it will pop out into a window you can move about.)

Click on the icon to the right of the +, which will roll initiative for the NPCs.

If you go to the chat window (in either window, but let's do it in the player's browser), you'll see their rolls. Now bring up the Combat Tracker in the player's window as well, and click on the d20 next to his name to have Alaric roll his own initiative.

Finally, back in the GM window, hit Begin Combat.

If you click on the currently active monster (in my case Goblin 2) it will select and highlight. Let's pick on Alaric: right click to bring up the combat HUD on him, left click on the target icon (bottom left) to target him.

Bring up the goblin's sheet, click on his bow icon to roll an attack. The shortbow card will come up in chat, (with Attack and Damage buttons in the GM window but not the player's): click Attack.

We hit (just! Alaric is AC18) Roll for damage.

It's not that I'm picking on the poor guy, my dice just don't like him much.

Before we carry on, let's pause and take stock of the things that, in our excitement to get started, we're probably now noticing that aren't as good as they could be.

For starters, Foundry doesn't tell you if you've hit or not, as I commented in a previous post. It also doesn't apply the damage. Both of these we can fix later with a module. For now though, we can edit his current hits by bringing up Alaric's combat HUD as the GM by right-clicking, and editing the big number at the bottom (not the one top left: that's his height above ground level).

While we're here, click on the gear wheel: this brings up the familiar token config dialog. Go to Resources, set Display Bars to Always, and Bar 1 to attributes.hp. Save Configuration, and do the same for the goblins. Here you may berate me for not telling you to do this in their Prototype Token config earlier (so do it now - I'd really like a master Prototype Token where I could turn this on for all tokens, if you're listening, Atropos.)

Now at least all our combat participants have health bars. We can move Goblin 2 out of sight of the door and click the right arrow on the encounter tracker to advance to the next combatant.

Alaric's turn. Being at least somewhat of the tank persuasion, he'll go whack Goblin 2. Over to the player window.

Now. Because he's not the GM, he can't bring up the HUD on a token he doesn't control, so to target the unfortunate goblin, we select the target icon (second down, second column on the left) and click on Goblin 1.

It's clobbering time!

Woah. Hold on a sec...

Remember we discussed the button bar last time? Ok. Double click to open his sheet, go to Inventory and drag the longsword icon to the bar, close the sheet. Now when we hit the button (or the appropriate key on the number row, the item card appears in chat with Attack/Damage buttons. Alaric rolls to hit...

He hits (after several attempts - I never said this wasn't a rigged demo!) and gets to do damage. As before, this doesn't get updated automatically, so we have to do it by hand, as the GM, by editing the hits in the combat HUD. Alaric's player can now hit End Turn on the Combat Tracker, and it's Goblin 1's turn.

Right. Hopefully you begin to get the idea.

We're going to leave it there for now: feel free to play through a bit more of the fight and explore what the HUD does, roll for Advantage etc. There's no substitute for having a play, and you can always wipe the encounter and start again.

Next time, having demonstrated how much nicer life could be than this, we're going to install a module to help with combat.

Aside: I am very much of the opinion that it's worth learning how to do things in completely vanilla FVTT before you start adding modules, as a) you gain a better understanding of core concepts, and b) you get a better appreciation for which modules scratch your personal itches.

Till next time. Stay safe, and roll good (virtual) dice.

Upcoming posts (subject to change as I go):
  • part 8: combat helper module(s)
  • part 9: player communication